Source: "You Don't Need a PhD to Formulate an Ethics Code
for Digital" - http://adage.com/article/digitalnext/a-phd-formulate-ethics-code-digital/237168/
As a consumer who is often preoccupied with my privacy
online, I have always been curious about the legislation that protect us in
this new digital world. It was
perplexing to read that legal parameters on data driven marketing are pretty
broad. Some companies strive to meet just
the baseline of these regulations which is extremely worrisome. Nevertheless, one cannot discount that some
do strive to meet a higher ethical standard.
The Digital Advertising Alliance Code does require enhanced notice for
customers which go beyond existing legislation, but is this self regulation
sufficient? These general regulations
still allow some companies to behave below an acceptable line of conduct. What is the trade off between profits and
privacy? At what point is invading a consumers privacy unethical? All these
"subjective questions" make one's individual values the key to
determining right and wrong. Are our own
personal views and values sufficient? Is common sense and personal judgement
enough? I do not believe so, as each of us have different ethical guide maps
stemming from our different religious and secular experiences. Why not set up more specific foundations
rather than broad industry standards. I believe there are bigger risks in
lacking regulation, but then again there is a fine line between too much
regulation and too little regulation. It
will be extremely interesting to follow the progression of legislation in the
digital arena in the coming years.
No comments:
Post a Comment