Two weeks ago, I posted an article regarding how Apple's Passbook could drive the development of the digital wallet industry. I found the following article interesting, because it seems to be a follow-up and expansion of the article on Apple's Passbook, questioning that if mobile, or mobile-only wallet is convenient enough?
Many of the mobile payment schemes currently under development or
being adopted are mobile pure plays, but not all. Google Wallet, for
example, began life as a mobile-only solution, but has since evolved
into a full digital wallet usable online as well as on smartphones.
Google’s Robin Dua, head of product management for Google Wallet,
explained that the company got feedback from users that “they wanted one
wallet that worked the same way both online as well as in the store,
through the phone.” When Google Wallet first launched, this was not the
case, noted Dua: “Users had to set up a mobile wallet, and so the
payment methods that they linked there were separate from the payment
methods that they linked to Google Checkout.” Now, however, it is the
case. “We’ve rebranded everything as Google Wallet. It’s one wallet that
works the same way. So any payment methods that you link in either
channel show up in the other channel, and it’s really one wallet that
works seamlessly across devices and channels.”
That seamless experience, summed up in one word, “convenience,” was the top reason US consumers told Catapult Marketing in March that they would be interested in using a mobile wallet.
Other players in the space, such as PayPal, American Express’ Serve
(effectively a PayPal competitor) and Visa’s V.me, function similarly as
fully digital wallets. They are able to access the same payment
preferences and profile information on a PC and smartphone. PayPal’s
Patrick Gauthier, head of product marketing and business operations, put
this in a broader context, saying, “Our vision is not limited to mobile
payment. This is not about payment anymore. This is about money and how
I manage and use it. This is how we see the wallet.” He added:
“Reimagining money and reimagining the wallet means not just being about
a card that is either on a chip, on a phone or in the cloud. It’s about
being able to connect the various accounts and sources of value and
sources of information that the consumer uses.”
It also means reimagining how consumers manage their money, at least to some extent. In a Q4 2011 study by consulting firm AlixPartners,
US consumers who expressed interest in using a digital wallet
overwhelmingly selected their primary bank as their preferred digital
wallet provider, far outpacing PayPal, digital giants such as Google,
Facebook and Apple, and other mobile-specific payment providers. These
results were consistent across every age group.
For companies that started life offline (such as American Express and
Visa) or online (such as Google and PayPal) before moving into the
mobile space, a multichannel approach fits with the way they (and their
customers) do business today. But their customers might not yet
recognize the way in which these businesses are equipped to serve them.
For makers of mobile wallets, the next challenge is convincing people
that they are offering useful solutions
Sources: http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1009407&ecid=a6506033675d47f881651943c21c5ed4#7pKCT50jxHKrOr6J.99
No comments:
Post a Comment